Sometimes the past is one of the best learning tools around! Use the following Real-Life Errors & Omissions Claim Situation involving office policies and procedures to avoid a similar legal showdown happening to you in your everyday real estate career. And be sure to have a good Real Estate E&O Insurance policy in place to protect you in case you find yourself in the middle of a court battle over a forgotten detail.

A real estate agent listed a residential property on behalf of its owner who was relocating to another city and looking to sell her home quickly so that she could buy another one before starting a new job. The agent offered to acquire the property under a written guaranteed sale listing contract and established a 90-day time period in the event the property failed to sell on the open market.

Problem
After the property failed to sell, the agent applied for financing to several lending institutions but could not qualify because of an inferior credit history. Meanwhile, the homeowner entered into a Purchase & Sale Agreement on another property and was fully expecting the agent to acquire her existing property. Complicating the matter further, the real estate company that the agent worked for was unaware of the guaranteed sale listing contract and was subsequently reluctant to come forward with the $225,000 necessary to make good on that contract.

Mistake
The agent made the independent decision to offer the guaranteed sale listing contract because he believed that the property would sell quickly and that his broker would not have to become involved financially. Because of his hasty assumptions, the agent never sought the approval of his broker and failed to take the necessary steps to assure financial qualification. In fact, it was also the broker’s policy not to offer these contracts.

Result
The homeowner sued the agent and his broker alleging that they breached the guaranteed sale listing contract and demanded specific performance. She also asked the Court to award money for ongoing mortgage payments, insurance costs, and maintenance expenses, among other damages. The case was resolved when the real estate company ultimately decided to acquire the property and pay the owner her out-of-pocket expenses and legal fees.

Prevention
The broker may have prevented the real estate company from being sued if a system of checks and balances was in place where he or a designee could have reviewed files on a regular basis to make sure office policies and procedures were being followed. This audit process can also be used as a tool to ensure compliance with the proper selection and completion of transactional documents and help avoid costly errors and omissions in all transactions. Lastly, conducting frequent educational sessions for agents is always an excellent opportunity to reinforce policies and procedures and will go a long way in preventing unwanted claims.

Do you have a similar story involving neglected office policies and procedures to share with us? Send us your learning experience or just let us know what you think about this one! Just leave a reply below!

If you have any questions about Pearl’s Errors & Omissions Insurance for real estate professionals, give us a call at 800.447.4982—whether you’re looking for a new E&O policy or have questions about your current one. We’d love to hear from you!

You can also visit our website for E&O insurance just for real estate professionals, www.pearlinsurance.com/eo, to find out more about our quality Errors & Omissions program, including policy features, risk management tools, and much more.

Sometimes the past is one of the best learning tools around! Use the following Real-Life Errors & Omissions Claim Situation involving disclosure to avoid a similar legal showdown happening to you in your everyday real estate career. And be sure to have a good Real Estate E&O Insurance policy in place to protect you in case you find yourself in the middle of a court battle over failure to disclose.

A real estate agent listed a residential property on behalf of sellers who were involved in ongoing litigation with their neighbors over ownership rights to a driveway that straddled the property line. The neighbor was attempting to prevent the sellers from using the driveway because of the encroachment.

Problem:
In the course of the litigation, the neighbor filed a lis pendens (Latin for “a suit pending”), which provided the sellers with notice that there was a claim on the property. The recording of a lis pendens informs the general public—and particularly anyone interested in buying or financing the property—that there is this potential claim against it.

Mistake:
Because the property was located in a state where a Seller’s Property Disclosure Statement was not required, no written publication as to the property’s legal status was provided to potential buyers. Moreover, the agent learned about the pending litigation from his sellers but misunderstood the ramifications of not disclosing it to those interested in purchasing the property.

Result:
The property went under contract to some unknowing buyers who ultimately decided to cancel the Purchase Agreement just prior to the close of escrow upon discovering the existence of the lis pendens. They subsequently sued the agent, his broker, and his sellers alleging that they misrepresented the property’s legal status and demanded the return of their deposit money, as well as moving & storage expenses, home inspection costs, bank fees, and the lost opportunity of a favorable interest rate, among other damages. The case was settled quickly since it was clear that the court would likely determine that the property’s legal status was material information that the buyers should have been made aware of.

Prevention:
In this situation, the agent should have followed pre-established office procedures and asked for assistance from his broker to learn what the impact of existing litigation would have on the sale of the property.  And regardless of the state’s written disclosure requirements, the agent should have had the sellers provide a document to any potential buyers informing them of the legal dispute with the neighbors. Also, the broker may have prevented the agent and business from being sued if he closely supervised the agent throughout the transactional process.

Do you have a similar story involving disclosure to share with us? Send us your learning experience or just let us know what you think about this one! Just leave a reply below!

If you have any questions about Pearl’s Errors & Omissions Insurance for real estate professionals, give us a call at 800.447.4982—whether you’re looking for a new E&O policy or have questions about your current one. We’d love to hear from you!

You can also visit www.pearlinsurance.com/eo to find out more about our quality Errors & Omissions program, including policy features, risk management tools, and much more.

Sometimes the past is one of the best learning tools around! Use the following Real-Life Errors & Omissions Claim Situation involving disclosure to avoid a similar legal showdown happening to you in your everyday real estate career. And be sure to have a good Real Estate E&O Insurance policy in place to protect you in case you find yourself in the middle of a court battle over failure to disclose.

A Real Estate agent, serving as property manager of a condominium building, was asked by the owner to sell it because he was approaching retirement and wanted to dispose of his real estate holdings and move to a warmer climate. Several months later, an offer was submitted through another agent that was accepted and then formalized in a Purchase and Sale Agreement.

Problem
The condominium grounds had a shared driveway with the adjacent property, but this fact was not divulged in the seller’s property condition disclosure or the Multiple Listing Service.

Mistake
The agent agreed to complete and sign the seller’s property condition disclosure and other documents on behalf of the owner.

Result
Following the closing, the buyer received a letter from the adjacent business owner’s attorney seeking a monetary sum for the use of the driveway. The buyer subsequently sued the seller and both real estate agents for failing to advise or otherwise detect that the seller had an established agreement to share the driveway. The agreement contained a provision that it was not transferable in the event the subject property was sold. During the litigation, documentary evidence revealed that the listing agent was aware of the agreement in his role as property manager.

And while the seller admitted that he gave the agent the authority to sign the property disclosure, he testified that he was unaware that the agent failed to disclose the agreement. The case was ultimately settled when the seller and listing agent agreed to pay the buyer the annual fee for use of the driveway for the next seven years.

Prevention
Obtaining the proper signatures or initials on all documents will always help protect you and your clients, while assuring that the transaction will proceed in a straightforward and legally binding fashion. In this case, the agent stepped into the shoes of the seller by executing the documents, resulting in the strong likelihood of a jury finding that the agent was making firsthand representations as to all facets of the property’s condition. Many real estate errors & omissions claims can be avoided by simply exercising ordinary care and judgment. This includes not only good communication skills, but also the implementation of other risk reduction methods into your daily routine that will help you avoid the need to pay costly attorney fees and settlements.

Do you have a similar story involving disclosure to share with us? Send us your learning experience or just let us know what you think about this one! Just leave a reply below!

If you have any questions about Pearl’s Errors & Omissions Insurance for real estate professionals, give us a call at 800.447.4982—whether you’re looking for a new E&O policy or have questions about your current one. We’d love to hear from you!

You can also visit www.pearlinsurance.com/eo to find out more about our quality Errors & Omissions program, including policy features, risk management tools, and much more.

Sometimes the past is one of the best learning tools around! Use the following Real-Life Errors & Omissions Claim Situation involving discriminatory practices to avoid a similar legal showdown happening to you in your everyday real estate career. And be sure to have a good Real Estate E&O Insurance policy in place to protect you in case you find yourself in the middle of a court battle over discrimination.

A Real Estate agent was hired by a landlord to lease a two-story townhouse that had one bedroom on the first floor and two bedrooms on the second floor, which was also where the only full bathroom was located. The first applicant to view the property informed the agent that his wife was physically disabled and would require accommodations so that she could access the second floor bathroom. He informed the agent that he was willing to make arrangements to have a chairlift installed and provided the required security deposit together with the fee for a credit check.

Problem
Despite the fact the background check revealed that the applicant had an excellent credit rating, the landlord refused to rent the apartment because he did not want the applicant to install the chairlift or otherwise make physical changes to the property. He instructed the agent to inform the applicants that he decided to lease to someone else, even though
there were no other applicants.

Mistake
When the agent conveyed the intentions of the landlord, it was a clear violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968, as amended by the Fair Housing Act of 1988.

Result
The applicant sued the landlord and the agent alleging that they discriminated against him and his wife when they were denied the opportunity to lease the property because of her physical disability. Their allegations were bolstered by the fact that the rental unit remained vacant for nearly four months after being informed that it was leased to someone else.

Moreover, the eventual tenant testified that she became interested in the property at a date later than the complainants. After incurring thousands of dollars in legal fees, the case settled on behalf of the agent without the agent admitting liability.

Prevention
Prohibited practices that lead to fair housing claims include the refusal to rent, lease or negotiate; offering different terms or affording different treatment; keeping records describing clients/customers; and failing to make reasonable accommodations. Providing equal service to all and not making assumptions of your client’s preferences will reduce the possibility of discrimination claims. And, as evidenced in this case, working with a discriminatory landlord can lead to claims alleging civil rights violations.

Do you have a similar story involving complaints regarding possible discrimination or questions on discrimination to share with us? Send us your learning experience or just let us know what you think about this one! Just leave a reply below!

If you have any questions about Pearl’s Errors & Omissions Insurance for real estate professionals, give us a call at 800.447.4982—whether you’re looking for a new E&O policy or have questions about your current one. We’d love to hear from you!

You can also visit www.pearlinsurance.com/eo to find out more about our quality Errors & Omissions program, including policy features, risk management tools, and much more.

Sometimes the past is one of the best learning tools around! Use the following Real-Life Errors & Omissions Claim Situation involving a REALTOR acting outside of her expertise to avoid a similar legal showdown happening to you in your everyday real estate career. And be sure to have a good Real Estate E&O Insurance policy in place to protect you in case you find yourself in the middle of a court battle over misrepresentation.

A residential real estate agent was approached by an industrial organization to help locate new property because it had outgrown its existing manufacturing space. The agent had handled several home sale transactions for employees of the company when they transferred in and out of town and had subsequently developed an excellent reputation with the company. The owners of the plant decided to reward the agent by engaging her services in their search.

Problem
The agent, while well-versed in residential sales, was inexperienced in commercial transactions.

Mistake
Unfamiliar with zoning issues beyond a rudimentary understanding, the agent located a piece of property that was suitable for commercial but not industrial construction—something necessary for the operation of her client’s business. Compounding the problem, the agent failed to obtain a Buyer’s Agency Agreement that contained a section requiring the client to explicitly state the type of property it was seeking. Ultimately, the commercially-zoned property was acquired after the agent represented to her client that it would be ideal for its needs.

Result
Following the close of escrow, the city denied the client’s application to construct the desired building since the intended operation did not comply with zoning regulations. A lawsuit ensued against the agent and her broker after the client’s zoning appeal failed. The lawsuit sought significant compensatory damages, including lost revenue and attorney’s fees, and asserted that the buyer relied on the expertise of the agent and broker. The buyer also alleged that they should have known that industrial zoning was required because its existing operation was zoned industrial. Faced with a likely adverse verdict at trial, the matter was resolved outside of court for a six-figure settlement.

Prevention
Mistakes often occur when a real estate professional dabbles outside his or her area of expertise. In this case, the agent should have followed pre-established office procedures and asked for assistance from her broker. The broker could also have avoided litigation if he closely supervised her throughout the transactional process. Soliciting the counsel of experts in commercial real estate could have prevented the end result.

Do you have a similar story involving complaints regarding acting within your area of expertise to share with us? Send us your learning experience or just let us know what you think about this one! Just leave a reply below!

If you have any questions about Pearl’s Errors & Omissions Insurance for real estate professionals, give us a call at 800.447.4982—whether you’re looking for a new E&O policy or have questions about your current one. We’d love to hear from you!

You can also visit www.pearlinsurance.com/eo to find out more about our quality Errors & Omissions program, including policy features, risk management tools, and much more.

Sometimes the past is one of the best learning tools around! Use the following Real-Life Errors & Omissions Claim Situation involving transfer of responsibility and lack of documentation to avoid a similar legal showdown happening to you in your everyday real estate career. And be sure to have a good Real Estate E&O Insurance policy in place to protect you in case you find yourself in the middle of a court battle over giving incorrect property information.

A Real Estate agent listed a high-end residential property for sale. The property was constructed prior to 1979, and because of its age, it was presumed to contain lead-based paint. The property eventually went under contract with the seller, who was an attorney, advising the agent that he would handle the negotiations directly with the buyers and would take care of the lead paint disclosure responsibilities.

Problem
The seller met with the buyers, who were also represented by the agent, and entered into the Purchase Agreement without the agent knowing its details until after execution. It was then brought to his attention that during the course of finalizing the Purchase Agreement, the seller never provided the buyers with the legally required lead paint disclosure.

Mistake
Unfortunately, the agent relied on the seller of the property to negotiate the terms of the contract and to produce the lead paint disclosure instead of handling the details himself. After the buyers signed the Purchase Agreement, they realized that they would have to incur thousands of dollars for lead abatement.

Result
The buyers, who were expecting their first child and wanted the home free of lead-based paint, attempted to terminate the contract, but ultimately purchased the property at a significantly reduced price. The seller, being a lawyer, knew that it was truly the agent’s responsibility to assure proper disclosure and then filed suit against him and the broker alleging that they violated both disclosure requirements and the state consumer protection statute. The state’s consumer protection statute called for an award of treble damages in the event the jury determined a violation existed.

The matter was resolved following a failed summary judgment motion (which would have dismissed the broker and agent from the litigation). The seller’s attorney argued that the agent misunderstood the instructions by the seller and that there was no evidentiary documentation from the agent on a transfer of responsibility.

Prevention
The agent would have avoided litigation if he had not allowed his client to assume his responsibilities during the course
of the transaction.

Do you have a similar story involving transfer of responsibility and documentation to share with us? Send us your learning experience or just let us know what you think about this one! Just leave a reply below!

If you have any questions about Pearl’s Errors & Omissions Insurance for real estate professionals, give us a call at 800.447.4982—whether you’re looking for a new E&O policy or have questions about your current one. We’d love to hear from you!

You can also visit www.pearlinsurance.com/eo to find out more about our quality Errors & Omissions program, including policy features, risk management tools, and much more.

Sometimes the past is one of the best learning tools around! Use the following Real-Life Errors & Omissions Claim Situation involving failure to disclose to avoid a similar legal showdown happening to you in your everyday real estate career. And be sure to have a good Real Estate E&O Insurance policy in place to protect you in case you find yourself in the middle of a court battle over giving incorrect property information.

A Real Estate agent listed a residential property for sale. The seller correctly completed a property disclosure form indicating the home was experiencing a termite infestation problem. The problem was detected when a previous potential buyer had a pest inspection performed. The findings resulted in a failed transaction, with both the seller and the real estate agent having received a copy of the report. Another buyer came along and eventually purchased the property knowing it had a termite problem.

Problem
Even though the agent provided the seller’s property disclosure form and verbally advised the buyer’s agent that the property had a termite infestation problem, the buyer alleged that the agents failed to disclose it.

Mistake
The listing agent neglected to provide the buyer with a copy of the termite inspection report, which detailed all the locations in the home where pest infestation existed.

Result
The buyer sued the seller, the listing agent, and the buyer’s agent alleging that by not providing the inspection report they failed to disclose the “true extent” of the pest infestation. It was also alleged that the buyer’s agent recommended to the buyer that he waive the inspection contingency in the Purchase Agreement. A $20,000 arbitration award was granted to the buyer after the arbitration panel determined that the inspection report contained information detailing a far greater problem than what was disclosed in the seller’s property disclosure or by the agents’ verbal representations.
The legal expenses to defend the listing agent alone amounted to $12,500.

Prevention
The litigation may have been prevented if the termite infestation report was provided to the buyer. Although this would not necessarily guarantee that the buyer would not have brought suit under the same pretext, it certainly would have bolstered efforts to have the court grant the defendants’ joint motion to have the case dismissed.

Do you have a similar story involving disclosure (or lack thereof) to share with us? Send us your learning experience or just let us know what you think about this one! Just leave a reply below!

If you have any questions about Pearl’s Errors & Omissions Insurance for real estate professionals, give us a call at 800.447.4982—whether you’re looking for a new E&O policy or have questions about your current one. We’d love to hear from you!

You can also visit www.pearlinsurance.com/eo to find out more about our quality Errors & Omissions program, including policy features, risk management tools, and much more.

Want to see how your current Errors & Omissions carrier measures up? Or just doing a little comparison shopping for your next Real Estate E&O Insurance policy? Check out our convenient E&O coverage checklist.