Sometimes the past is one of the best learning tools around! Use the following Real-Life Errors & Omissions Claim Situation involving an agent taking on what should have been the buyers’ due diligence to avoid a similar legal showdown happening to you in your everyday real estate career. And be sure to have a good Real Estate E&O Insurance policy in place to protect you in case you find yourself in the middle of a court battle over negligence.

A Real Estate agent was working with prospective buyers who were searching for a residential property for their growing family. The agent showed them several properties before they decided to submit an offer on a home that recently underwent a complete renovation, including a two-room addition.

Problem:
The renovation was completed by an unlicensed contractor who failed to obtain the necessary building permits. Moreover, the property was located in a state that did not require the owners to complete a seller’s property disclosure statement, leaving the buyers to determine whether any defective conditions existed through the engagement of experts.

Mistake:
Since the buyers were busy with their careers and the school activities of their children, the agent volunteered to do the due diligence for the buyers. This included hiring a home inspector and termite inspector. In accepting the agent’s offer, the buyers assumed that he would also research whether or not the project was “legal.”

Result:
Approximately five months after moving into the property, the buyers received a letter from the city informing them that the renovations were completed without the required permits. The ensuing building inspection discovered that the addition did not conform to the building codes since it lacked a load-bearing wall. The buyers then sued the sellers,
the listing agent, the home inspector, and their buyers’ agent for failing to either disclose or detect the property’s nonconformance. The parties ultimately resolved the litigation after the defendants agreed to pay for the remediation and obtain the certificate of occupancy.

Prevention:
An agent should never volunteer to take on the due diligence for buyers by ordering or attending inspections on their behalf. If there’s any defective condition with the property, the agent will likely be sued for negligently referring the inspectors while putting themselves in the position where a jury could determine that they fraudulently induced the buyers into the purchase. Sound risk management on the part of an agent is to have the buyers select the inspectors and not become actively involved in the conversation between the buyers and the inspector. Although it is best to be present during the inspection should the client seek assistance, an agent should not be interpreting an inspector’s findings or recommendations. The agent may later be held accountable for failing to address something pointed out by the inspector. Lastly, always recommend that the buyers contact the controlling authority for conformance inquiries.

Do you have a similar story involving negligence, failure to disclose, or nonconforming renovations to share with us? Send us your learning experience or just let us know what you think about this one! Just leave a reply below!

If you have any questions about Pearl’s Errors & Omissions Insurance for real estate professionals, give us a call at 800.447.4982—whether you’re looking for a new E&O policy or have questions about your current one. We’d love to hear from you!

You can also visit our website for E&O insurance just for real estate professionals, www.pearlinsurance.com/eo, to find out more about our quality Errors & Omissions program, including policy features, risk management tools, and much more. Or get a quick estimate now!

Recently, we came across a couple of articles asking to what extent a real estate professional holds the burden of assisting clients rather than taking advantage of a good real estate deal themselves. On the one hand, a REALTOR owes it to their buyer clients to show them any properties they may be interested in, and to their seller clients to find the best financial offer out there. On the other hand, the agent may also be a buyer, and their offer may be the best one the seller receives.

Real estate agents, and REALTORS in particular, are held to the standards of the National Association of REALTORS (NAR), including its Code of Ethics. This includes protecting and promoting the interests of their clients, and treating all parties honestly. So if you know you want to purchase a property as a rental investment, but your client expresses an interest in it, what do you do? Bite your tongue and show them the property without telling them you would like to purchase it? If you are representing the seller, whatever offer entails the highest price would be in their best interest, right?

These questions can be tricky, as can the other point the writer brings up about how REALTORS should want more first-time homebuyers to have a chance to purchase rather than getting beat out by more knowledgeable real estate professionals. Should agents have to endure a waiting period wherein the listing is exposed to the market for a certain amount of time, before they are allowed to purchase a property someone already has their eye on and is willing to put in an offer for?

Here is the Part 1 article from writer Tom Kelly for Inman News.

In response to the comments Kelly received on his first article, “Should Real Estate Agents Get First Dibs on New Listings?”, his Part 2 article discusses the audience response, and follows it up with a Washington state case that delves into this very topic.

“The responses fell into two main pots,” writes Kelly. “Readers said agents should be allowed to buy if it was in the best interest of the seller. Others who responded thought that agents should be allowed to purchase a property as soon as it is listed, provided they knowingly had no other active clients who wanted the same home.”

It sounds like it all comes down to the “treating all parties honestly” part of the code. In the case of the agent who bought from under his client’s nose, he not only bought a property he knew his client was interested in, but he also relayed some personal, and possibly incorrect information to the listing agent to keep his client from winning the bid. To make things worse, the agent bought the property under his wife’s name, presumably to hide his indiscretion.

Court documents show that the seller’s agent didn’t know the buyer’s agent’s wife was related to the buyer’s agent, or he wouldn’t have participated in the deal. Besides this lapse of honesty, there were two other areas it seems the buyer’s agent went beyond ethical judgement as well as Washington law by attempting to beat the system: 1) He seemingly ignored Washington state real estate law requiring a buyer’s agent to “be loyal to the buyer by taking no action that is adverse or detrimental to the buyer’s interest in a transaction (and) to timely disclose to the buyer any conflicts of interest.” 2) The law also rules against revealing confidential information after the agent-client relations ceases or has been finalized.

Although the settlement itself is confidential, it is obvious the agent was a bit underhanded in his dealings with his buyer client as well as the seller. Hopefully he had a good E&O policy in place to help him with the legal costs, but it is likely his name has been dragged through the mud in the real estate community.

What do you think—should agents be made to wait until a property has been listed for a while before they get a chance to purchase it, allowing less knowledgeable buyers some time to work out the kinks in their offer? Is it punishing those in the real estate profession to do so?

Guy Chipman from the Texas Association of REALTORS^® wrote a well-received article entitled “Errors, Omissions, and Lawsuits, Oh My!” on the key lessons he learned while looking for an E&O provider. We will be posting one tip per week from Chipman’s article, with Pearl’s comments in italics. See what Pearl E&O coverage offers.

2. Make sure all your services are covered. If the insurer can’t cover all of the services your company offers—residential, commercial, property management—it’s probably not the right company to meet your E&O needs.

Pearl’s policy covers property managers, appraisers, auctioneers, assistants to agents and business brokers. Beyond covering all aspects of real estate practice, we offers flexibility to ensure that each individual realtor’s individual needs are met. Pearl offers per claim coverage and aggregate limits ranging from $250,000 to $5,000,000, and deductibles from $1,000 to $25,000, or higher. Pearl gives all of our customers’ individualized attention in order to customize a plan that is ideal for their needs and business focus.

Have you ever struggled with an E&O agent unable to meet your needs? How do you pick the right E&O Provider? Let us know by posting a comment below!

Guy Chipman from the Texas Association of REALTORS^® wrote a well-received article entitled “Errors, Omissions, and Lawsuits, Oh My!” on the key lessons he learned while looking for an E&O provider. We will be posting one tip per week from Chipman’s article, with Pearl’s comments in italics. See what Pearl E&O coverage offers.

1. Find a specialized agent. Not every insurance office has an agent who is knowledgeable about this type of insurance. It’s a specialized field, and an agent will need expertise in both real estate and malpractice insurance to quote this coverage effectively.

Pearl agrees that without experience and expertise in Real Estate E&O coverage, an insurer doesn’t have much to offer to a real estate professional. At Pearl, we’ve offered Real Estate E&O for over 30 years, and recently completely reinvigorated our coverage to make it best in class among E&O providers. We added new features like a mold endorsement with higher limits, deductible reduction for early claim resolution, a higher limit open house property damage coverage option, and improved many prior features of our plan.

Have you ever struggled with an E&O agent unable to meet your needs? How do you pick the right E&O Provider? Let us know by posting a comment below!

Sometimes the past is one of the best learning tools around! Use the following Real-Life Errors & Omissions Claim Situation involving a delayed response to a real estate errors and omissions lawsuit to avoid a similar legal showdown happening to you in your everyday real estate career. And be sure to have a good Real Estate E&O Insurance policy in place to protect you in case you find yourself in the middle of a court battle over negligence.

Following the close of escrow on a residential property, a Real Estate broker and his agent were sued by the buyers for allegedly failing to provide the required Seller’s Property Disclosure Statement. The broker and his agent were adamant that they were in compliance and would have been able to demonstrate from documentary evidence that it was provided to the buyers’ agent. The evidence included a facsimile transmission of a cover letter addressing the “attached” property disclosure, along with electronic mail exchanges with the buyers’ agent discussing the property’s condition.

Problem:
Believing that the lawsuit was frivolous, the broker and agent simply ignored it. They also ignored the ensuing Motion for Default brought by the buyers’ attorney for failing to file an answer to the complaint.

Mistake:
By ignoring both the lawsuit and default motion, the court entered a five-figure judgment against the Real Estate brokerage. And to make matters worse, the Default Judgment was not tendered to the Real Estate Errors & Omissions insurance carrier until one month later.

Result:
Despite an all-out effort on the part of the defense attorney assigned by the Errors & Omissions insurance carrier, the Default Judgment could not be overturned due to the delayed responses on the part of the brokerage. Furthermore, the insurance carrier was under no obligation to pay the judgment since the Real Estate brokerage failed to comply with the terms and conditions of its Errors & Omissions policy by not providing timely notice of the claim.

Prevention:
Many jurisdictions have very strict deadlines for filing court documents. In this case it’s quite clear that the Real Estate brokerage could have avoided its problems if the lawsuit was reported immediately to the Errors & Omissions insurance carrier. And given the favorable evidence in the transaction file, the claim may have been voluntarily dismissed once the buyers’ attorney was presented the irrefutable evidence. In order to preserve this evidence, it is very important not to destroy your file following a closing so that an effective defense can be asserted on your behalf. The transaction file should include the following:

• the date and time of all meetings or phone conversations and a list of all participants

• e-mails and faxes

• verification that what you say and write is correct—keep a record of all verified information, contracts, agency disclosures, seller disclosures, and closing documents with the appropriate signatures. And never sign anything for your client.

Do you have a similar story involving negligence to share with us? Send us your learning experience or just let us know what you think about this one! Just leave a reply below!

If you have any questions about Pearl’s Errors & Omissions Insurance for real estate professionals, give us a call at 800.447.4982—whether you’re looking for a new E&O policy or have questions about your current one. We’d love to hear from you!

You can also visit our website for E&O insurance just for real estate professionals, www.pearlinsurance.com/eo, to find out more about our quality Errors & Omissions program, including policy features, risk management tools, and much more.

You’re working harder than ever—shouldn’t your E&O provider do the same?

Pearl Insurance knows you’ve put in the extra effort to remain viable in this industry, and so have we. For the last three decades, we’ve continually innovated Pearl’s E&O coverage to keep up with the ever-changing demands of the real estate market. And we’ve once again made it new and improved!

We’re so excited to announce major enhancements to our Real Estate Errors & Omissions policy, which Pearl insureds will enjoy right away:

• Environmental Failure to Advise up to full policy limits
• Public Relations Advisory Services
• Lockbox coverage to full policy limits
• Consent to Settle
• Mold Endorsement with increased limits—NEW!
• Subpoena Assistance—NEW!
• Free 3-year Extended Reporting Period—NEW!
• Loss Mitigation Credit—NEW!
• Network and Privacy coverage with a $25,000 sublimit—NEW!
• Deductible Reduction for Early Claims Resolution—IMPROVED! Applies to both defense and damages!
• Open House Property Damage coverage—IMPROVED! Up to FULL policy limits!
• Agent-Owned Property Coverage—IMPROVED! No waiting period applies!
• And many more benefits and NEW improvements!

Pearl E&O Insurance: It’s already robust!

Sometimes the past is one of the best learning tools around! Use the following Real-Life Errors & Omissions Claim Situation involving a REALTOR^® calendar error to avoid a similar legal showdown happening to you in your everyday real estate career. And be sure to have a good Real Estate E&O Insurance policy in place to protect you in case you find yourself in the middle of a court battle over negligence.

A Real Estate professional was serving as the commercial leasing broker for a shopping plaza on behalf of the holder of a 15-year ground lease that included an option to renew for four successive five-year terms. The renewal was contingent upon the ground leaseholder giving written notice to the plaza owner nine months prior to the expiration of the lease. As part of his duties, the broker agreed to accept the responsibility of exercising the renewal option as well as those of the six retail tenants in the plaza.

Problem:
The ground lease and the retail leases were not timely renewed.

Mistake:
The leasing broker marked the wrong date in his calendar, therefore missing the deadline.

Result:
Although the first extension did not occur within the time frame allowed by the ground lease, the plaza owner, who discovered the oversight, still accepted the renewal. However, the retail tenants refused to renew their respective leases under the same terms despite the broker’s frantic efforts to salvage the deals. Five of the tenants notified the broker and leaseholder that they would be relocating, leaving much of the property vacant at the conclusion of the lease period. The broker attempted but failed to locate suitable tenants for the plaza, resulting in a significant shortfall in revenue for the leaseholder. A lawsuit was then filed against the broker alleging negligence and sought reimbursement for lost rental income. After several rounds of negotiations, the parties settled the litigation well into six figures.

Prevention:
If the broker took a moment to carefully review the lease agreements and establish an effective calendar diary system, the error could have been avoided. A sound diary system includes the creation of a backup measure in the event the first notification method fails. Furthermore, it’s always a good practice to conduct periodic reviews of your contractual obligations to ensure that they’re well understood and in compliance. Many lawsuits arise over simple clerical errors that cost the real estate community thousands of dollars in legal fees and settlements. It also results in spending time and effort to fend off regulatory complaints brought by unsatisfied clients, not to mention the possibility of license suspension or revocation.

Do you have a similar story involving negligence to share with us? Send us your learning experience or just let us know what you think about this one! Just leave a reply below!

If you have any questions about Pearl’s Errors & Omissions Insurance for real estate professionals, give us a call at 800.447.4982—whether you’re looking for a new E&O policy or have questions about your current one. We’d love to hear from you!

You can also visit our website for E&O insurance just for real estate professionals, www.pearlinsurance.com/eo, to find out more about our quality Errors & Omissions program, including policy features, risk management tools, and much more.

All too often, real estate prospects look to foreclosures as an easy way to buy property on the cheap. Although there are likely decent foreclosure deals available, purchasing a foreclosed home can come with a fair amount of headaches. Keep these in mind if your client decides to go ahead with acquiring a foreclosure.

1) Get it inspected by a professional.

Stipulate to your client that they need to get the property checked out by a certified professional home inspector, and don’t bid on houses that aren’t available for inspection. Don’t let your client base their buying decision on appearances alone; the home could have mold, pests damaging its structural integrity, an insulation problem, shoddy construction, asbestos … you name it. Your client needs to know how much work (and money) they will need to put into the home up front.

2) Consider factors that may have led to the foreclosure.

Is crime on the rise in the neighborhood? Are the schools not making the grade? Is the view not so pleasant? How long has the home been empty? Are there plenty of other foreclosures in the area? Foreclosures aren’t always due to a lack of money or budgeting skills; maybe the previous homeowner bought the house without realizing there was a particular blight on the property.

3) Be cautious if the house is currently occupied.

Keep in mind that some people involved in the foreclosure may be living on the property and may be difficult when it comes time to leave. Even with title in hand, your client could have a hard time evicting the unwanted tenants. And once they do leave, they may have retaliated by destroying the property. (This may not be an issue in certain areas.)

4) Advise your client against flipping.

Unless your client has an arsenal of cheap contractors and materials at their disposal, there always seems to be pitfalls along the way that end up costing more than the person looking to make a quick bundle bargained for.

5) Recommend to buyers that renovations are within the their budget.

Even for properties needing a seemingly modest amount of renovation, there’s usually more work and money involved than planned. In order to make the most of the foreclosure’s bargain price, the buyer should not go into further debt by taking out loans and losing money on interest. Have a home inspector detail all work needed and make sure the buyer has enough cash to fix it all.

6) Recommend they find a reputable lender.

The wrong lender might not spend as much time on a foreclosure case as on a standard real estate purchase, because they stand to make less money on the former. A good lender will research what your client’s best option is. Tell your client to ask a lot of questions—the lender should explain everything to your client very clearly. You should advise them to meet with a real estate attorney as well.

Pearl Insurance is a nationally known broker, marketer, and administrator that specializes in the design and administration of quality insurance plans for associations, affinity groups, unions, and large firms. In addition to providing real estate professionals with quality products and services for 30 years, their partnership with the XL Insurance companies (through Indian Harbor Insurance Company and Greenwich Insurance Company) solidifies their strength, allowing them to offer association members an A rated (by A.M. Best) E&O program. For more information about Pearl’s sponsored E&O programs, call 800.289.8170.

Information provided within this article is not to be taken as legal advice and is to be used for educational and illustrative purposes only.

Sometimes the past is one of the best learning tools around! Use the following Real-Life Errors & Omissions Claim Situation involving REALTOR^® acting outside of your expertise to avoid a similar legal showdown happening to you in your everyday real estate career. And be sure to have a good Real Estate E&O Insurance policy in place to protect you in case you find yourself in the middle of a court battle over performing a function that is outside of your realm as a real estate professional.

A Real Estate agent listed an older residential property that needed a roof replacement because water was penetrating the attic and running down the walls. As part of the marketing strategy the sellers agreed with the agent that the best way to sell the home for a better price would be to have a new roof installed. In addition to fixing the water intrusion problem, it was believed that the enhanced curb appeal of the property would likely garner more interest.

Problem:
The contractor that was hired to do the work was not fully paid by the sellers when the work was completed.

Mistake:
After the marketing strategy was agreed to, the agent decided to select and hire the roofing contractor on behalf of  her clients so that they could focus on prepping and painting the water stains on the interior walls of the home. The sellers provided a check to the agent for the down payment required by the roofer, but it was the agent who signed
the contract order.

Result:
When the project was close to completion, a potential buyer tendered an offer on the property that the sellers quickly accepted. However, when the contractor wasn’t paid by the sellers for the balance due, he filed a mechanic’s lien against the sellers and the real estate agent for non-payment. The buyer then sued the sellers for specific performance and
demanded that either they or the agent pay the contractor to lift the lien. Following a two-month delay in the closing, the matter was resolved after the sellers and agent agreed to contribute equal shares to pay the contractor.

Prevention:
An agent should never select and hire any vendor to do work on sellers’ property—and should certainly never sign a work order on their behalf. By doing so, an agent becomes contractually liable to the vendor and may, as in this case, become the object of litigation when a buyer of the property attempts to enforce a Purchase Agreement. It’s also important to remember that most, if not all, real estate errors & omissions policies don’t provide coverage for claims based on or arising out of liability of others assumed under any contract or agreement. Making the simple decision to leave contractor selection and engagement to a homeowner will increase your chances of avoiding litigation from both the contractor and any potential buyer of property.

Do you have a similar story involving acting outside of your expertise to share with us? Send us your learning experience or just let us know what you think about this one! Just leave a reply below!

If you have any questions about Pearl’s Errors & Omissions Insurance for real estate professionals, give us a call at 800.447.4982—whether you’re looking for a new E&O policy or have questions about your current one. We’d love to hear from you!

You can also visit our website for E&O insurance just for real estate professionals, www.pearlinsurance.com/eo, to find out more about our quality Errors & Omissions program, including policy features, risk management tools, and much more.