Sometimes the past is one of the best learning tools around! Use the following Real-Life Errors & Omissions Claim Situation involving an agent taking on what should have been the buyers’ due diligence to avoid a similar legal showdown happening to you in your everyday real estate career. And be sure to have a good Real Estate E&O Insurance policy in place to protect you in case you find yourself in the middle of a court battle over negligence.

A Real Estate agent was working with prospective buyers who were searching for a residential property for their growing family. The agent showed them several properties before they decided to submit an offer on a home that recently underwent a complete renovation, including a two-room addition.

Problem:
The renovation was completed by an unlicensed contractor who failed to obtain the necessary building permits. Moreover, the property was located in a state that did not require the owners to complete a seller’s property disclosure statement, leaving the buyers to determine whether any defective conditions existed through the engagement of experts.

Mistake:
Since the buyers were busy with their careers and the school activities of their children, the agent volunteered to do the due diligence for the buyers. This included hiring a home inspector and termite inspector. In accepting the agent’s offer, the buyers assumed that he would also research whether or not the project was “legal.”

Result:
Approximately five months after moving into the property, the buyers received a letter from the city informing them that the renovations were completed without the required permits. The ensuing building inspection discovered that the addition did not conform to the building codes since it lacked a load-bearing wall. The buyers then sued the sellers,
the listing agent, the home inspector, and their buyers’ agent for failing to either disclose or detect the property’s nonconformance. The parties ultimately resolved the litigation after the defendants agreed to pay for the remediation and obtain the certificate of occupancy.

Prevention:
An agent should never volunteer to take on the due diligence for buyers by ordering or attending inspections on their behalf. If there’s any defective condition with the property, the agent will likely be sued for negligently referring the inspectors while putting themselves in the position where a jury could determine that they fraudulently induced the buyers into the purchase. Sound risk management on the part of an agent is to have the buyers select the inspectors and not become actively involved in the conversation between the buyers and the inspector. Although it is best to be present during the inspection should the client seek assistance, an agent should not be interpreting an inspector’s findings or recommendations. The agent may later be held accountable for failing to address something pointed out by the inspector. Lastly, always recommend that the buyers contact the controlling authority for conformance inquiries.

Do you have a similar story involving negligence, failure to disclose, or nonconforming renovations to share with us? Send us your learning experience or just let us know what you think about this one! Just leave a reply below!

If you have any questions about Pearl’s Errors & Omissions Insurance for real estate professionals, give us a call at 800.447.4982—whether you’re looking for a new E&O policy or have questions about your current one. We’d love to hear from you!

You can also visit our website for E&O insurance just for real estate professionals, www.pearlinsurance.com/eo, to find out more about our quality Errors & Omissions program, including policy features, risk management tools, and much more. Or get a quick estimate now!

Recently, we came across a couple of articles asking to what extent a real estate professional holds the burden of assisting clients rather than taking advantage of a good real estate deal themselves. On the one hand, a REALTOR owes it to their buyer clients to show them any properties they may be interested in, and to their seller clients to find the best financial offer out there. On the other hand, the agent may also be a buyer, and their offer may be the best one the seller receives.

Real estate agents, and REALTORS in particular, are held to the standards of the National Association of REALTORS (NAR), including its Code of Ethics. This includes protecting and promoting the interests of their clients, and treating all parties honestly. So if you know you want to purchase a property as a rental investment, but your client expresses an interest in it, what do you do? Bite your tongue and show them the property without telling them you would like to purchase it? If you are representing the seller, whatever offer entails the highest price would be in their best interest, right?

These questions can be tricky, as can the other point the writer brings up about how REALTORS should want more first-time homebuyers to have a chance to purchase rather than getting beat out by more knowledgeable real estate professionals. Should agents have to endure a waiting period wherein the listing is exposed to the market for a certain amount of time, before they are allowed to purchase a property someone already has their eye on and is willing to put in an offer for?

Here is the Part 1 article from writer Tom Kelly for Inman News.

In response to the comments Kelly received on his first article, “Should Real Estate Agents Get First Dibs on New Listings?”, his Part 2 article discusses the audience response, and follows it up with a Washington state case that delves into this very topic.

“The responses fell into two main pots,” writes Kelly. “Readers said agents should be allowed to buy if it was in the best interest of the seller. Others who responded thought that agents should be allowed to purchase a property as soon as it is listed, provided they knowingly had no other active clients who wanted the same home.”

It sounds like it all comes down to the “treating all parties honestly” part of the code. In the case of the agent who bought from under his client’s nose, he not only bought a property he knew his client was interested in, but he also relayed some personal, and possibly incorrect information to the listing agent to keep his client from winning the bid. To make things worse, the agent bought the property under his wife’s name, presumably to hide his indiscretion.

Court documents show that the seller’s agent didn’t know the buyer’s agent’s wife was related to the buyer’s agent, or he wouldn’t have participated in the deal. Besides this lapse of honesty, there were two other areas it seems the buyer’s agent went beyond ethical judgement as well as Washington law by attempting to beat the system: 1) He seemingly ignored Washington state real estate law requiring a buyer’s agent to “be loyal to the buyer by taking no action that is adverse or detrimental to the buyer’s interest in a transaction (and) to timely disclose to the buyer any conflicts of interest.” 2) The law also rules against revealing confidential information after the agent-client relations ceases or has been finalized.

Although the settlement itself is confidential, it is obvious the agent was a bit underhanded in his dealings with his buyer client as well as the seller. Hopefully he had a good E&O policy in place to help him with the legal costs, but it is likely his name has been dragged through the mud in the real estate community.

What do you think—should agents be made to wait until a property has been listed for a while before they get a chance to purchase it, allowing less knowledgeable buyers some time to work out the kinks in their offer? Is it punishing those in the real estate profession to do so?

Sometimes the past is one of the best learning tools around! Use the following Real-Life Errors & Omissions Claim Situation involving a delayed response to a real estate errors and omissions lawsuit to avoid a similar legal showdown happening to you in your everyday real estate career. And be sure to have a good Real Estate E&O Insurance policy in place to protect you in case you find yourself in the middle of a court battle over negligence.

Following the close of escrow on a residential property, a Real Estate broker and his agent were sued by the buyers for allegedly failing to provide the required Seller’s Property Disclosure Statement. The broker and his agent were adamant that they were in compliance and would have been able to demonstrate from documentary evidence that it was provided to the buyers’ agent. The evidence included a facsimile transmission of a cover letter addressing the “attached” property disclosure, along with electronic mail exchanges with the buyers’ agent discussing the property’s condition.

Problem:
Believing that the lawsuit was frivolous, the broker and agent simply ignored it. They also ignored the ensuing Motion for Default brought by the buyers’ attorney for failing to file an answer to the complaint.

Mistake:
By ignoring both the lawsuit and default motion, the court entered a five-figure judgment against the Real Estate brokerage. And to make matters worse, the Default Judgment was not tendered to the Real Estate Errors & Omissions insurance carrier until one month later.

Result:
Despite an all-out effort on the part of the defense attorney assigned by the Errors & Omissions insurance carrier, the Default Judgment could not be overturned due to the delayed responses on the part of the brokerage. Furthermore, the insurance carrier was under no obligation to pay the judgment since the Real Estate brokerage failed to comply with the terms and conditions of its Errors & Omissions policy by not providing timely notice of the claim.

Prevention:
Many jurisdictions have very strict deadlines for filing court documents. In this case it’s quite clear that the Real Estate brokerage could have avoided its problems if the lawsuit was reported immediately to the Errors & Omissions insurance carrier. And given the favorable evidence in the transaction file, the claim may have been voluntarily dismissed once the buyers’ attorney was presented the irrefutable evidence. In order to preserve this evidence, it is very important not to destroy your file following a closing so that an effective defense can be asserted on your behalf. The transaction file should include the following:

• the date and time of all meetings or phone conversations and a list of all participants

• e-mails and faxes

• verification that what you say and write is correct—keep a record of all verified information, contracts, agency disclosures, seller disclosures, and closing documents with the appropriate signatures. And never sign anything for your client.

Do you have a similar story involving negligence to share with us? Send us your learning experience or just let us know what you think about this one! Just leave a reply below!

If you have any questions about Pearl’s Errors & Omissions Insurance for real estate professionals, give us a call at 800.447.4982—whether you’re looking for a new E&O policy or have questions about your current one. We’d love to hear from you!

You can also visit our website for E&O insurance just for real estate professionals, www.pearlinsurance.com/eo, to find out more about our quality Errors & Omissions program, including policy features, risk management tools, and much more.

You’re working harder than ever—shouldn’t your E&O provider do the same?

Pearl Insurance knows you’ve put in the extra effort to remain viable in this industry, and so have we. For the last three decades, we’ve continually innovated Pearl’s E&O coverage to keep up with the ever-changing demands of the real estate market. And we’ve once again made it new and improved!

We’re so excited to announce major enhancements to our Real Estate Errors & Omissions policy, which Pearl insureds will enjoy right away:

• Environmental Failure to Advise up to full policy limits
• Public Relations Advisory Services
• Lockbox coverage to full policy limits
• Consent to Settle
• Mold Endorsement with increased limits—NEW!
• Subpoena Assistance—NEW!
• Free 3-year Extended Reporting Period—NEW!
• Loss Mitigation Credit—NEW!
• Network and Privacy coverage with a $25,000 sublimit—NEW!
• Deductible Reduction for Early Claims Resolution—IMPROVED! Applies to both defense and damages!
• Open House Property Damage coverage—IMPROVED! Up to FULL policy limits!
• Agent-Owned Property Coverage—IMPROVED! No waiting period applies!
• And many more benefits and NEW improvements!

Pearl E&O Insurance: It’s already robust!

Sometimes the past is one of the best learning tools around! Use the following Real-Life Errors & Omissions Claim Situation involving REALTOR^® acting outside of your expertise to avoid a similar legal showdown happening to you in your everyday real estate career. And be sure to have a good Real Estate E&O Insurance policy in place to protect you in case you find yourself in the middle of a court battle over performing a function that is outside of your realm as a real estate professional.

A Real Estate agent listed an older residential property that needed a roof replacement because water was penetrating the attic and running down the walls. As part of the marketing strategy the sellers agreed with the agent that the best way to sell the home for a better price would be to have a new roof installed. In addition to fixing the water intrusion problem, it was believed that the enhanced curb appeal of the property would likely garner more interest.

Problem:
The contractor that was hired to do the work was not fully paid by the sellers when the work was completed.

Mistake:
After the marketing strategy was agreed to, the agent decided to select and hire the roofing contractor on behalf of  her clients so that they could focus on prepping and painting the water stains on the interior walls of the home. The sellers provided a check to the agent for the down payment required by the roofer, but it was the agent who signed
the contract order.

Result:
When the project was close to completion, a potential buyer tendered an offer on the property that the sellers quickly accepted. However, when the contractor wasn’t paid by the sellers for the balance due, he filed a mechanic’s lien against the sellers and the real estate agent for non-payment. The buyer then sued the sellers for specific performance and
demanded that either they or the agent pay the contractor to lift the lien. Following a two-month delay in the closing, the matter was resolved after the sellers and agent agreed to contribute equal shares to pay the contractor.

Prevention:
An agent should never select and hire any vendor to do work on sellers’ property—and should certainly never sign a work order on their behalf. By doing so, an agent becomes contractually liable to the vendor and may, as in this case, become the object of litigation when a buyer of the property attempts to enforce a Purchase Agreement. It’s also important to remember that most, if not all, real estate errors & omissions policies don’t provide coverage for claims based on or arising out of liability of others assumed under any contract or agreement. Making the simple decision to leave contractor selection and engagement to a homeowner will increase your chances of avoiding litigation from both the contractor and any potential buyer of property.

Do you have a similar story involving acting outside of your expertise to share with us? Send us your learning experience or just let us know what you think about this one! Just leave a reply below!

If you have any questions about Pearl’s Errors & Omissions Insurance for real estate professionals, give us a call at 800.447.4982—whether you’re looking for a new E&O policy or have questions about your current one. We’d love to hear from you!

You can also visit our website for E&O insurance just for real estate professionals, www.pearlinsurance.com/eo, to find out more about our quality Errors & Omissions program, including policy features, risk management tools, and much more.

Sometimes the past is one of the best learning tools around! Use the following Real-Life Errors & Omissions Claim Situation involving REALTOR^® misrepresentation to avoid a similar legal showdown happening to you in your everyday real estate career. And be sure to have a good Real Estate E&O Insurance policy in place to protect you in case you find yourself in the middle of a court battle over not following standard office procedures.

A Real Estate agent listed a residential condominium in an age-restricted community that required, through its homeowners’ association (“HOA”) covenants, that at least one person residing in each unit must be at least 55 years old. Fortunately for the agent and his seller, he was able to sell it quickly to an out-of-state couple who met the age restriction requisite and who planned to live in the property after their retirement two years later.

Problem:
The buyers intended to have their granddaughter live in the property until they retired while she attended a nearby university.

Mistake:
Before the property went under contract, the buyers questioned the agent on whether the restrictive covenants would allow this living arrangement. The agent informed his clients that it would create no problems since the buyers, who would be the actual owners of the unit, satisfied the age condition.

Result:

Soon after the close of escrow, the buyers’ granddaughter moved into the unit and applied for a parking permit only to be informed by the HOA that she and her grandparents were not in compliance with the age restriction covenants since she, as the only resident, did not meet the age requirement. The HOA then declared that she would have to vacate the property. And after unsuccessfully pleading with the HOA Board of Directors to waive the age restriction, the buyers sued the real estate agent, his broker, and the seller alleging negligent and intentional misrepresentation and demanded that they provide alternative housing for their granddaughter until she graduated from college. Following extensive negotiations, the matter was resolved.

Prevention:
The agent incorrectly assumed that there would be no problem with a college-age woman occupying the unit as long as the owners met the age requirement. To complicate matters further, there was a dispute as to whether the agent actually provided a copy of the HOA covenants to the buyers before they executed the Purchase Agreement. If the agent was able to demonstrate that the buyers acknowledged receipt of the covenants in writing, he would have been able to put himself and his broker in a better position to defend the case. Having the ability to prove that the buyers had the opportunity to review the HOA documents would have certainly helped in that endeavor.

Do you have a similar story involving misrepresentation to share with us? Send us your learning experience or just let us know what you think about this one! Just leave a reply below!

If you have any questions about Pearl’s Errors & Omissions Insurance for real estate professionals, give us a call at 800.447.4982—whether you’re looking for a new E&O policy or have questions about your current one. We’d love to hear from you!

You can also visit our website for E&O insurance just for real estate professionals, www.pearlinsurance.com/eo, to find out more about our quality Errors & Omissions program, including policy features, risk management tools, and much more.

Sometimes the past is one of the best learning tools around! Use the following Real-Life Errors & Omissions Claim Situation involving REALTOR^® negligence to avoid a similar legal showdown happening to you in your everyday real estate career. And be sure to have a good Real Estate E&O Insurance policy in place to protect you in case you find yourself in the middle of a court battle over not following standard office procedures.

A Real Estate agent listed an owner-occupied, two-family residential property with the sellers residing on the main floor and tenants residing in a ground-floor living unit. The residence was sold rather quickly due to its appeal to investors seeking a steady flow of revenue from the long-time tenants, who expressed a desire to remain there.

Problem:
On numerous occasions over two decades, the City notified the sellers that the property did not meet the zoning requirements because the ground-floor unit had been constructed without a permit and was in violation of City Ordinances and Federal Flood Insurance regulations.

Mistake:
When the agent entered into the Listing Agreement with the sellers, they provided him with copies of documents relating to the property, including the most recent non-conforming notice from the City, which also stated that the bathroom and kitchen on the ground floor had to be removed, along with the tenants. However, the agent did not take the time to review the material and simply placed it in his transactional file.

Result:
Soon after the close of escrow, the buyers applied for a permit to complete renovations and learned from the City Zoning and Planning Office that the property was not in compliance. The buyers then sued the sellers and the real estate agent alleging breach of contract, negligent misrepresentation, fraud, and unfair and deceptive trade practices.

They sought damages for lost income, the removal of the kitchen and bathroom, and diminution of value relating to the amount paid above the true market value and the deficient square footage. During the early stages of litigation, a copy of the City’s non-conforming notice was discovered in the agent’s transactional file. The case was settled shortly thereafter.

Prevention:
The agent was one of the leading producers in the marketplace and had successfully closed numerous transactions over his 25-year career. But in this case, the agent’s success led to complacency, resulting in his failure to follow his real estate office’s pre-established procedure of reviewing all documents prior to marketing and advertising property to the public. A simple review would have alerted him to the potential disclosure issues and that his clients were not fully forthcoming about the dwelling’s status. The real estate broker also learned a valuable lesson to make sure that he, too, should follow his own procedures of reviewing the work product of his agents so that situations like this can be avoided.

Sometimes the past is one of the best learning tools around! Use the following Real-Life Errors & Omissions Claim Situation involving REALTOR^® disclosure to avoid a similar legal showdown happening to you in your everyday real estate career. And be sure to have a good Real Estate E&O Insurance policy in place to protect you in case you find yourself in the middle of a court battle over not disclosing information about parties involved in a real estate transaction.

A Real Estate agent had an exclusive listing agreement with the builder of a new, 10-lot residential subdivision. The agent was quickly able to locate three individual buyers who entered into purchase & sale agreements and tendered earnest money deposits to the builder. Shortly thereafter, construction was underway and the respective lending institutions began to release money from the buyers’ construction loans.

Problem:
Approximately halfway through the construction process, the builder verbally notified the real estate agent and contract buyers that he was experiencing financial difficulties in a separate development project due to slow sales and the inability to create cash flow.

Mistake:
Despite the contractor’s financial problems, the agent continued to market and sell the remaining lots, accepting additional earnest money and turning the funds over to the builder. The agent decided not to advise the new contract buyers of the builder’s financial problems, assuming he would be able to overcome these problems because he was a “good builder”.

Result:
The builder soon abandoned the projects that were underway and filed for bankruptcy protection. He left three contract buyers with half-completed houses and seven more with lost deposits ranging from a few thousand dollars to six figures. The buyers then sued the real estate agent alleging that he failed to disclose the builder’s true financial ability and status. The claims ultimately settled against the real estate agent, but without immediate contribution from
the builder.

Prevention:
An agent should never make assumptions about any seller’s or buyer’s financial capabilities and should certainly disclose something material in nature such as a builder’s impaired financial ability. Clearly, the agent should not have continued to accept earnest money after having learned about the builder’s financial struggles. Being a “good builder” doesn’t necessarily guarantee good business management skills. For good measure, the agent should also
confirm in writing to the existing contract buyers when a significant development such as this occurs. It should additionally be recommended to these buyers that they seek the advice of legal counsel and other qualified individuals to help them make decisions on how to proceed. Legal and financial advice should never be given by a real estate agent in any situation. Following these practices will not only result in well-informed buyers, but will help avoid
unwanted litigation.

Do you have a similar story involving disclosure to share with us? Send us your learning experience or just let us know what you think about this one! Just leave a reply below!

If you have any questions about Pearl’s Errors & Omissions Insurance for real estate professionals, give us a call at 800.447.4982—whether you’re looking for a new E&O policy or have questions about your current one. We’d love to hear from you!

You can also visit our website for E&O insurance just for real estate professionals, www.pearlinsurance.com/eo, to find out more about our quality Errors & Omissions program, including policy features, risk management tools, and much more.

Sometimes the past is one of the best learning tools around! Use the following Real-Life Errors & Omissions Claim Situation involving failure to disclose to avoid a similar legal showdown happening to you in your everyday real estate career. And be sure to have a good Real Estate E&O Insurance policy in place to protect you in case you find yourself in the middle of a court battle over not disclosing property conditions.

A real estate agent listed a residential property on behalf of sellers who completed a Seller’s Property Disclosure Statement, which revealed problems with leaky windows in the attached garage.

Problem
The property went under contract to prospective buyers, who hired a home inspector. The inspector discovered that the windows throughout the home were either defective or had been installed improperly. The findings resulted in a failed transaction, with both the sellers and the real estate agent having received a copy of the report.

Mistake
Another buyer came along and eventually purchased the property and was provided a copy of the Seller’s Property Disclosure Statement. However, the statement was not amended to reflect the results of the recent home inspection and the buyer was not provided a copy of the inspector’s report. The real estate agent claimed that she verbally advised the buyer of the content of the report.

Result
Following the close of escrow, the buyer soon discovered that most of the windows were experiencing problems. He then sued the sellers and the real estate agent alleging that by not providing the inspection report and not amending the Seller’s Property Disclosure Statement, they failed to fully disclose the defects. It was further alleged that the real estate agent recommended to the buyer that he waive the inspection contingency in the Purchase Agreement. The case ultimately settled for $12,000.

Prevention
The litigation may have been prevented if an amended Seller’s Property Disclosure Statement and the home inspection report were provided to the buyer. Although this would not necessarily guarantee that the buyer would not have brought suit under the same pretext, it would have helped the defendants position their respective cases to request that the court dismiss the litigation.

Do you have a similar story involving disclosure to share with us? Send us your learning experience or just let us know what you think about this one! Just leave a reply below!

If you have any questions about Pearl’s Errors & Omissions Insurance for real estate professionals, give us a call at 800.447.4982—whether you’re looking for a new E&O policy or have questions about your current one. We’d love to hear from you!

You can also visit our website for E&O insurance just for real estate professionals, www.pearlinsurance.com/eo, to find out more about our quality Errors & Omissions program, including policy features, risk management tools, and much more.

Are you on the fence regarding whether or not you need Errors and Omissions Insurance to protect you in your daily real estate business practices? Sometimes, no matter how careful you are to manage your risk in your day-to-day operations, you still get sued because of a forgotten detail or a minor misstep. Here are the Top 5 Reasons you need real estate E&O coverage!