Sometimes the past is one of the best learning tools around! Use the following Real-Life Errors & Omissions Claim Situation involving failure to disclose to avoid a similar legal showdown happening to you in your everyday real estate career. And be sure to have a good Real Estate E&O Insurance policy in place to protect you in case you find yourself in the middle of a court battle over not disclosing property conditions.

A real estate agent listed a residential property on behalf of sellers who completed a Seller’s Property Disclosure Statement, which revealed problems with leaky windows in the attached garage.

Problem
The property went under contract to prospective buyers, who hired a home inspector. The inspector discovered that the windows throughout the home were either defective or had been installed improperly. The findings resulted in a failed transaction, with both the sellers and the real estate agent having received a copy of the report.

Mistake
Another buyer came along and eventually purchased the property and was provided a copy of the Seller’s Property Disclosure Statement. However, the statement was not amended to reflect the results of the recent home inspection and the buyer was not provided a copy of the inspector’s report. The real estate agent claimed that she verbally advised the buyer of the content of the report.

Result
Following the close of escrow, the buyer soon discovered that most of the windows were experiencing problems. He then sued the sellers and the real estate agent alleging that by not providing the inspection report and not amending the Seller’s Property Disclosure Statement, they failed to fully disclose the defects. It was further alleged that the real estate agent recommended to the buyer that he waive the inspection contingency in the Purchase Agreement. The case ultimately settled for $12,000.

Prevention
The litigation may have been prevented if an amended Seller’s Property Disclosure Statement and the home inspection report were provided to the buyer. Although this would not necessarily guarantee that the buyer would not have brought suit under the same pretext, it would have helped the defendants position their respective cases to request that the court dismiss the litigation.

Do you have a similar story involving disclosure to share with us? Send us your learning experience or just let us know what you think about this one! Just leave a reply below!

If you have any questions about Pearl’s Errors & Omissions Insurance for real estate professionals, give us a call at 800.447.4982—whether you’re looking for a new E&O policy or have questions about your current one. We’d love to hear from you!

You can also visit our website for E&O insurance just for real estate professionals, www.pearlinsurance.com/eo, to find out more about our quality Errors & Omissions program, including policy features, risk management tools, and much more.

Are you on the fence regarding whether or not you need Errors and Omissions Insurance to protect you in your daily real estate business practices? Sometimes, no matter how careful you are to manage your risk in your day-to-day operations, you still get sued because of a forgotten detail or a minor misstep. Here are the Top 5 Reasons you need real estate E&O coverage!

Sometimes the past is one of the best learning tools around! Use the following Real-Life Errors & Omissions Claim Situation involving misrepresentation to avoid a similar legal showdown happening to you in your everyday real estate career. And be sure to have a good Real Estate E&O Insurance policy in place to protect you in case you find yourself in the middle of a court battle over a seemingly minor detail.

A real estate agent was workinAgentg with a prospective first-time buyer who was searching for a residential property that did not require significant improvements because she did not have the financial resources to invest in structural remediation. The agent showed his buyer several properties before she decided to submit an offer on a home that she believed only needed cosmetic improvements.

Problem
The home had a history of water intrusion problems resulting in extensive wood rot and insect infestation.

Mistake
While walking through the property, both the real estate agent and the buyer noticed water stains on the ceilings and walls in the second floor bedrooms. They were advised by the sellers that the stains were a result of “old damage” and that a pre-existing roof problem had been repaired. The agent, unfortunately, took the word of the sellers and failed to recommend that his buyer obtain a home inspection for further investigation.

Result
After taking possession, the buyer discovered during a rainstorm that water was penetrating the roof and seeping through the second floor ceiling and walls. She then hired a contractor who determined that the wood rot and infestation was so extensive that the ceiling joists, wall studs, and sheetrock had to be replaced. The buyer subsequently sued the sellers alleging intentional misrepresentation and the agent alleging misrepresentation and failure to recommend a home inspector. The parties ultimately resolved the litigation for $42,500.

Prevention
Always conduct a careful visual inspection of any property whether you’re serving as a listing agent or buyer’s agent and be sure to look for clues or “red flags” that may indicate latent defects which may involve more extensive problems. Never act outside the area of your expertise. You should recognize when to ask for help from another professional or recommend the use of services from other professionals such as home inspectors and pest inspectors. It is essential that buyers realize their right to request any type of property inspection—and that inspection contracts and reports may contain disclaimers. If the buyer decides not to do so, have them acknowledge this choice in writing and keep all documents for your records.

Do you have a similar story involving acting outside of your expertise to share with us? Send us your learning experience or just let us know what you think about this one! Just leave a reply below!

If you have any questions about Pearl’s Errors & Omissions Insurance for real estate professionals, give us a call at 800.447.4982—whether you’re looking for a new E&O policy or have questions about your current one. We’d love to hear from you!

You can also visit our website for E&O insurance just for real estate professionals, www.pearlinsurance.com/eo, to find out more about our quality Errors & Omissions program, including policy features, risk management tools, and much more.

Sometimes the past is one of the best learning tools around! Use the following Real-Life Errors & Omissions Claim Situation involving office policies and procedures to avoid a similar legal showdown happening to you in your everyday real estate career. And be sure to have a good Real Estate E&O Insurance policy in place to protect you in case you find yourself in the middle of a court battle over a forgotten detail.

A real estate agent listed a residential property on behalf of its owner who was relocating to another city and looking to sell her home quickly so that she could buy another one before starting a new job. The agent offered to acquire the property under a written guaranteed sale listing contract and established a 90-day time period in the event the property failed to sell on the open market.

Problem
After the property failed to sell, the agent applied for financing to several lending institutions but could not qualify because of an inferior credit history. Meanwhile, the homeowner entered into a Purchase & Sale Agreement on another property and was fully expecting the agent to acquire her existing property. Complicating the matter further, the real estate company that the agent worked for was unaware of the guaranteed sale listing contract and was subsequently reluctant to come forward with the $225,000 necessary to make good on that contract.

Mistake
The agent made the independent decision to offer the guaranteed sale listing contract because he believed that the property would sell quickly and that his broker would not have to become involved financially. Because of his hasty assumptions, the agent never sought the approval of his broker and failed to take the necessary steps to assure financial qualification. In fact, it was also the broker’s policy not to offer these contracts.

Result
The homeowner sued the agent and his broker alleging that they breached the guaranteed sale listing contract and demanded specific performance. She also asked the Court to award money for ongoing mortgage payments, insurance costs, and maintenance expenses, among other damages. The case was resolved when the real estate company ultimately decided to acquire the property and pay the owner her out-of-pocket expenses and legal fees.

Prevention
The broker may have prevented the real estate company from being sued if a system of checks and balances was in place where he or a designee could have reviewed files on a regular basis to make sure office policies and procedures were being followed. This audit process can also be used as a tool to ensure compliance with the proper selection and completion of transactional documents and help avoid costly errors and omissions in all transactions. Lastly, conducting frequent educational sessions for agents is always an excellent opportunity to reinforce policies and procedures and will go a long way in preventing unwanted claims.

Do you have a similar story involving neglected office policies and procedures to share with us? Send us your learning experience or just let us know what you think about this one! Just leave a reply below!

If you have any questions about Pearl’s Errors & Omissions Insurance for real estate professionals, give us a call at 800.447.4982—whether you’re looking for a new E&O policy or have questions about your current one. We’d love to hear from you!

You can also visit our website for E&O insurance just for real estate professionals, www.pearlinsurance.com/eo, to find out more about our quality Errors & Omissions program, including policy features, risk management tools, and much more.

Sometimes the past is one of the best learning tools around! Use the following Real-Life Errors & Omissions Claim Situation involving discriminatory practices to avoid a similar legal showdown happening to you in your everyday real estate career. And be sure to have a good Real Estate E&O Insurance policy in place to protect you in case you find yourself in the middle of a court battle over discrimination.

A Real Estate agent was hired by a landlord to lease a two-story townhouse that had one bedroom on the first floor and two bedrooms on the second floor, which was also where the only full bathroom was located. The first applicant to view the property informed the agent that his wife was physically disabled and would require accommodations so that she could access the second floor bathroom. He informed the agent that he was willing to make arrangements to have a chairlift installed and provided the required security deposit together with the fee for a credit check.

Problem
Despite the fact the background check revealed that the applicant had an excellent credit rating, the landlord refused to rent the apartment because he did not want the applicant to install the chairlift or otherwise make physical changes to the property. He instructed the agent to inform the applicants that he decided to lease to someone else, even though
there were no other applicants.

Mistake
When the agent conveyed the intentions of the landlord, it was a clear violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968, as amended by the Fair Housing Act of 1988.

Result
The applicant sued the landlord and the agent alleging that they discriminated against him and his wife when they were denied the opportunity to lease the property because of her physical disability. Their allegations were bolstered by the fact that the rental unit remained vacant for nearly four months after being informed that it was leased to someone else.

Moreover, the eventual tenant testified that she became interested in the property at a date later than the complainants. After incurring thousands of dollars in legal fees, the case settled on behalf of the agent without the agent admitting liability.

Prevention
Prohibited practices that lead to fair housing claims include the refusal to rent, lease or negotiate; offering different terms or affording different treatment; keeping records describing clients/customers; and failing to make reasonable accommodations. Providing equal service to all and not making assumptions of your client’s preferences will reduce the possibility of discrimination claims. And, as evidenced in this case, working with a discriminatory landlord can lead to claims alleging civil rights violations.

Do you have a similar story involving complaints regarding possible discrimination or questions on discrimination to share with us? Send us your learning experience or just let us know what you think about this one! Just leave a reply below!

If you have any questions about Pearl’s Errors & Omissions Insurance for real estate professionals, give us a call at 800.447.4982—whether you’re looking for a new E&O policy or have questions about your current one. We’d love to hear from you!

You can also visit www.pearlinsurance.com/eo to find out more about our quality Errors & Omissions program, including policy features, risk management tools, and much more.

Sometimes the past is one of the best learning tools around! Use the following Real-Life Errors & Omissions Claim Situation involving a REALTOR overstating a property’s condition to avoid a similar legal showdown happening to you in your everyday real estate career. And be sure to have a good Real Estate E&O Insurance policy in place to protect you in case you find yourself in the middle of a court battle over misrepresentation.

A real estate agent accepted a listing to sell an older residential property that had been renovated by the sellers. While the sellers only had the property for a year, they had spent a significant amount of money refinishing the hardwood floors, painting the walls and ceilings, and doing some minor electrical and plumbing upgrades in the kitchen and bathrooms.

Problem
Although the property looked to be in excellent condition with the cosmetic improvements, the agent marketed the property in the Multiple Listing Service and sales brochure as being “totally renovated.”

Mistake
The agent’s advertising material and verbal representations overstated the improvements that were made to the property.

Result
The agent was approached by first-time homebuyers who mistakenly believed that the home’s electrical and plumbing systems were completely upgraded. They submitted a purchase offer but waived their rights to a home inspection because they lacked the money to pay for it. Shortly after the close of escrow, they discovered that the electrical and plumbing systems were old and deteriorating and would have to be upgraded. They subsequently sued both the agent and her sellers alleging that they misrepresented the true condition of the property and demanded a judgment equivalent to the cost of the upgrades. The matter eventually settled before trial.

Prevention
During the process of selling real estate, always avoid using adjectives that overstate improvements to property. More often than not, these adjectives lead to higher expectations and eventual dissatisfaction of buyers who may believe that they didn’t receive what they bargained for. Also, be certain when stating facts about the property such as age or structure, and don’t gloss over potential buyers’ concerns. It is important to never oversell (“With a little paint, I’m sure this would be great!”). No one wants to be the recipient of a lawsuit and a loss of reputation.

Do you have a similar story involving complaints regarding acting overselling a property to share with us? Send us your learning experience or just let us know what you think about this one! Just leave a reply below!

If you have any questions about Pearl’s Errors & Omissions Insurance for real estate professionals, give us a call at 800.447.4982—whether you’re looking for a new E&O policy or have questions about your current one. We’d love to hear from you!

You can also visit www.pearlinsurance.com/eo to find out more about our quality Errors & Omissions program, including policy features, risk management tools, and much more.

If you think discrimination in real estate is a thing of the past, you may want to think again. Read this The New York Times article on a real-life case of discrimination that happened recently in two Bronx neighborhoods. We hope you’ve enjoyed reading our risk management tips and resources for April – Fair Housing Month. Be sure to remain diligent on managing your risk and avoiding legal issues by following the National Association of REALTORS^® Code of Ethics and having a quality Errors and Omissions Insurance policy in place—like those offered by Pearl Insurance!

Sometimes the past is one of the best learning tools around! Use the following Real-Life Errors & Omissions Claim Situation involving negligence to avoid a similar legal showdown happening to you in your everyday real estate career. And be sure to have a good Real Estate E&O Insurance policy in place to protect you in case you find yourself in the middle of a court battle over giving incorrect property information.

A Real Estate agent listed a cottage for sale that was located on a lake inlet. The cottage, situated on an oddly shaped lot, was originally built so that it faced the water but also had views of an adjacent, partially wooded lot. Because of the shape of the lot, the agent urged the sellers to have the lot surveyed and staked by a qualified professional.

Problem
Although the property was surveyed and staked properly, the agent incorrectly interpreted the positioning of the stakes. The agent assumed that the stake in front of the cottage facing the lake represented the boundary between the lots. However, the stake actually represented the opposite boundary of the adjacent lot. The stake representing the boundary between the lots was situated to the right of where they were standing and was not visible because of overgrowth.

Mistake
In addition to misinterpreting the positioning of the pins, the agent neglected to provide the survey results to the buyer for review.

Result
After the closing, the buyers removed the trees located in front of the cottage in order to improve their view of the lake and to install a dock for their boat. Because the agent presented the incorrect property line to the buyers, the buyers stripped the adjacent lot of most of its trees and vegetation during their renovation. The adjacent property owners, who had plans to construct a year-round retirement home on their property, sued the buyers, who in turn brought the agent and her managing broker into the litigation alleging negligence and negligent supervision.

Prevention
Due to the agent’s incorrect assumptions, a rather significant settlement was paid to both the buyers and the neighboring property owners. Had the agent provided the survey results to the buyers, the litigation may have been prevented.

Do you have a similar story involving a charge of negligence to share with us? Send us your learning experience or just let us know what you think about this one! Just leave a reply below!

If you have any questions about Pearl’s Errors & Omissions Insurance for real estate professionals, give us a call at 800.447.4982—whether you’re looking for a new E&O policy or have questions about your current one. We’d love to hear from you!

You can also visit www.pearlinsurance.com/eo to find out more about our quality Errors & Omissions program, including policy features, risk management tools, and much more.