Recently, we came across a couple of articles asking to what extent a real estate professional holds the burden of assisting clients rather than taking advantage of a good real estate deal themselves. On the one hand, a REALTOR owes it to their buyer clients to show them any properties they may be interested in, and to their seller clients to find the best financial offer out there. On the other hand, the agent may also be a buyer, and their offer may be the best one the seller receives.

Real estate agents, and REALTORS in particular, are held to the standards of the National Association of REALTORS (NAR), including its Code of Ethics. This includes protecting and promoting the interests of their clients, and treating all parties honestly. So if you know you want to purchase a property as a rental investment, but your client expresses an interest in it, what do you do? Bite your tongue and show them the property without telling them you would like to purchase it? If you are representing the seller, whatever offer entails the highest price would be in their best interest, right?

These questions can be tricky, as can the other point the writer brings up about how REALTORS should want more first-time homebuyers to have a chance to purchase rather than getting beat out by more knowledgeable real estate professionals. Should agents have to endure a waiting period wherein the listing is exposed to the market for a certain amount of time, before they are allowed to purchase a property someone already has their eye on and is willing to put in an offer for?

Here is the Part 1 article from writer Tom Kelly for Inman News.

In response to the comments Kelly received on his first article, “Should Real Estate Agents Get First Dibs on New Listings?”, his Part 2 article discusses the audience response, and follows it up with a Washington state case that delves into this very topic.

“The responses fell into two main pots,” writes Kelly. “Readers said agents should be allowed to buy if it was in the best interest of the seller. Others who responded thought that agents should be allowed to purchase a property as soon as it is listed, provided they knowingly had no other active clients who wanted the same home.”

It sounds like it all comes down to the “treating all parties honestly” part of the code. In the case of the agent who bought from under his client’s nose, he not only bought a property he knew his client was interested in, but he also relayed some personal, and possibly incorrect information to the listing agent to keep his client from winning the bid. To make things worse, the agent bought the property under his wife’s name, presumably to hide his indiscretion.

Court documents show that the seller’s agent didn’t know the buyer’s agent’s wife was related to the buyer’s agent, or he wouldn’t have participated in the deal. Besides this lapse of honesty, there were two other areas it seems the buyer’s agent went beyond ethical judgement as well as Washington law by attempting to beat the system: 1) He seemingly ignored Washington state real estate law requiring a buyer’s agent to “be loyal to the buyer by taking no action that is adverse or detrimental to the buyer’s interest in a transaction (and) to timely disclose to the buyer any conflicts of interest.” 2) The law also rules against revealing confidential information after the agent-client relations ceases or has been finalized.

Although the settlement itself is confidential, it is obvious the agent was a bit underhanded in his dealings with his buyer client as well as the seller. Hopefully he had a good E&O policy in place to help him with the legal costs, but it is likely his name has been dragged through the mud in the real estate community.

What do you think—should agents be made to wait until a property has been listed for a while before they get a chance to purchase it, allowing less knowledgeable buyers some time to work out the kinks in their offer? Is it punishing those in the real estate profession to do so?

All too often, real estate prospects look to foreclosures as an easy way to buy property on the cheap. Although there are likely decent foreclosure deals available, purchasing a foreclosed home can come with a fair amount of headaches. Keep these in mind if your client decides to go ahead with acquiring a foreclosure.

1) Get it inspected by a professional.

Stipulate to your client that they need to get the property checked out by a certified professional home inspector, and don’t bid on houses that aren’t available for inspection. Don’t let your client base their buying decision on appearances alone; the home could have mold, pests damaging its structural integrity, an insulation problem, shoddy construction, asbestos … you name it. Your client needs to know how much work (and money) they will need to put into the home up front.

2) Consider factors that may have led to the foreclosure.

Is crime on the rise in the neighborhood? Are the schools not making the grade? Is the view not so pleasant? How long has the home been empty? Are there plenty of other foreclosures in the area? Foreclosures aren’t always due to a lack of money or budgeting skills; maybe the previous homeowner bought the house without realizing there was a particular blight on the property.

3) Be cautious if the house is currently occupied.

Keep in mind that some people involved in the foreclosure may be living on the property and may be difficult when it comes time to leave. Even with title in hand, your client could have a hard time evicting the unwanted tenants. And once they do leave, they may have retaliated by destroying the property. (This may not be an issue in certain areas.)

4) Advise your client against flipping.

Unless your client has an arsenal of cheap contractors and materials at their disposal, there always seems to be pitfalls along the way that end up costing more than the person looking to make a quick bundle bargained for.

5) Recommend to buyers that renovations are within the their budget.

Even for properties needing a seemingly modest amount of renovation, there’s usually more work and money involved than planned. In order to make the most of the foreclosure’s bargain price, the buyer should not go into further debt by taking out loans and losing money on interest. Have a home inspector detail all work needed and make sure the buyer has enough cash to fix it all.

6) Recommend they find a reputable lender.

The wrong lender might not spend as much time on a foreclosure case as on a standard real estate purchase, because they stand to make less money on the former. A good lender will research what your client’s best option is. Tell your client to ask a lot of questions—the lender should explain everything to your client very clearly. You should advise them to meet with a real estate attorney as well.

Pearl Insurance is a nationally known broker, marketer, and administrator that specializes in the design and administration of quality insurance plans for associations, affinity groups, unions, and large firms. In addition to providing real estate professionals with quality products and services for 30 years, their partnership with the XL Insurance companies (through Indian Harbor Insurance Company and Greenwich Insurance Company) solidifies their strength, allowing them to offer association members an A rated (by A.M. Best) E&O program. For more information about Pearl’s sponsored E&O programs, call 800.289.8170.

Information provided within this article is not to be taken as legal advice and is to be used for educational and illustrative purposes only.

Considering venturing into the lucrative—if you can handle the extra workload—life of short sales? Roger Higle, course writer for Keller Williams University, Keller Williams Realty International in Austin, Texas, asks four top distressed property agents how they became successful at selling short sales and REOs in A Peek into the World of Short Sales and REOs.

According to Higle’s experts, seller qualification is very important in short sales. A seller must be very forthcoming with his financial situation, have the work ethic to produce the many documents required by banks to make a short sale successful, and trust his agent’s advice and expertise to make the short sale happen. Short sale lead generation is much like traditional lead generation, with one exception: asking the seller a very direct and sometimes unsettling question, “Are you behind in your mortgage payments?”

Lending institutions are now expecting more from agents than ever before. It’s the agent doing a lot of the work that a bank previously performed, resulting in additional overhead for the selling agent. Agents are also taking on additional risk. Since bank-owned properties are typically sold “as is,” agents need to really consider the risks of unforeseen defects and other problems with the properties—and to have all lender contracts reviewed and to know what their E&O insurance will cover.

For the full article, visit A Peek into the World of Short Sales and REOs.

Sometimes the past is one of the best learning tools around! Use the following Real-Life Errors & Omissions Claim Situation involving office policies and procedures to avoid a similar legal showdown happening to you in your everyday real estate career. And be sure to have a good Real Estate E&O Insurance policy in place to protect you in case you find yourself in the middle of a court battle over a forgotten detail.

A real estate agent listed a residential property on behalf of its owner who was relocating to another city and looking to sell her home quickly so that she could buy another one before starting a new job. The agent offered to acquire the property under a written guaranteed sale listing contract and established a 90-day time period in the event the property failed to sell on the open market.

Problem
After the property failed to sell, the agent applied for financing to several lending institutions but could not qualify because of an inferior credit history. Meanwhile, the homeowner entered into a Purchase & Sale Agreement on another property and was fully expecting the agent to acquire her existing property. Complicating the matter further, the real estate company that the agent worked for was unaware of the guaranteed sale listing contract and was subsequently reluctant to come forward with the $225,000 necessary to make good on that contract.

Mistake
The agent made the independent decision to offer the guaranteed sale listing contract because he believed that the property would sell quickly and that his broker would not have to become involved financially. Because of his hasty assumptions, the agent never sought the approval of his broker and failed to take the necessary steps to assure financial qualification. In fact, it was also the broker’s policy not to offer these contracts.

Result
The homeowner sued the agent and his broker alleging that they breached the guaranteed sale listing contract and demanded specific performance. She also asked the Court to award money for ongoing mortgage payments, insurance costs, and maintenance expenses, among other damages. The case was resolved when the real estate company ultimately decided to acquire the property and pay the owner her out-of-pocket expenses and legal fees.

Prevention
The broker may have prevented the real estate company from being sued if a system of checks and balances was in place where he or a designee could have reviewed files on a regular basis to make sure office policies and procedures were being followed. This audit process can also be used as a tool to ensure compliance with the proper selection and completion of transactional documents and help avoid costly errors and omissions in all transactions. Lastly, conducting frequent educational sessions for agents is always an excellent opportunity to reinforce policies and procedures and will go a long way in preventing unwanted claims.

Do you have a similar story involving neglected office policies and procedures to share with us? Send us your learning experience or just let us know what you think about this one! Just leave a reply below!

If you have any questions about Pearl’s Errors & Omissions Insurance for real estate professionals, give us a call at 800.447.4982—whether you’re looking for a new E&O policy or have questions about your current one. We’d love to hear from you!

You can also visit our website for E&O insurance just for real estate professionals, www.pearlinsurance.com/eo, to find out more about our quality Errors & Omissions program, including policy features, risk management tools, and much more.

Many real estate buyers and sellers like to focus on Real Estate Owned, or REO, properties because these can be inexpensive compared to the standard real estate transaction. REO properties are usually owned by the bank or real estate company, but are not as safe as one might think in regards to your Errors and Omissions liability. Are you protected? Learn more at www.pearlinsurance.com/social-media/eo.