Sometimes the past is one of the best learning tools around! Use the following Real-Life Errors & Omissions Claim Situation involving REALTOR® negligence to avoid a similar legal showdown happening to you in your everyday real estate career. And be sure to have a good Real Estate E&O Insurance policy in place to protect you in case you find yourself in the middle of a court battle over not following standard office procedures.
A Real Estate agent listed an owner-occupied, two-family residential property with the sellers residing on the main floor and tenants residing in a ground-floor living unit. The residence was sold rather quickly due to its appeal to investors seeking a steady flow of revenue from the long-time tenants, who expressed a desire to remain there.
Problem:
On numerous occasions over two decades, the City notified the sellers that the property did not meet the zoning requirements because the ground-floor unit had been constructed without a permit and was in violation of City Ordinances and Federal Flood Insurance regulations.
Mistake:
When the agent entered into the Listing Agreement with the sellers, they provided him with copies of documents relating to the property, including the most recent non-conforming notice from the City, which also stated that the bathroom and kitchen on the ground floor had to be removed, along with the tenants. However, the agent did not take the time to review the material and simply placed it in his transactional file.
Result:
Soon after the close of escrow, the buyers applied for a permit to complete renovations and learned from the City Zoning and Planning Office that the property was not in compliance. The buyers then sued the sellers and the real estate agent alleging breach of contract, negligent misrepresentation, fraud, and unfair and deceptive trade practices.
They sought damages for lost income, the removal of the kitchen and bathroom, and diminution of value relating to the amount paid above the true market value and the deficient square footage. During the early stages of litigation, a copy of the City’s non-conforming notice was discovered in the agent’s transactional file. The case was settled shortly thereafter.
Prevention:
The agent was one of the leading producers in the marketplace and had successfully closed numerous transactions over his 25-year career. But in this case, the agent’s success led to complacency, resulting in his failure to follow his real estate office’s pre-established procedure of reviewing all documents prior to marketing and advertising property to the public. A simple review would have alerted him to the potential disclosure issues and that his clients were not fully forthcoming about the dwelling’s status. The real estate broker also learned a valuable lesson to make sure that he, too, should follow his own procedures of reviewing the work product of his agents so that situations like this can be avoided.
Sometimes the past is one of the best learning tools around! Use the following Real-Life Errors & Omissions Claim Situation involving REALTOR® disclosure to avoid a similar legal showdown happening to you in your everyday real estate career. And be sure to have a good Real Estate E&O Insurance policy in place to protect you in case you find yourself in the middle of a court battle over not disclosing information about parties involved in a real estate transaction.
A Real Estate agent had an exclusive listing agreement with the builder of a new, 10-lot residential subdivision. The agent was quickly able to locate three individual buyers who entered into purchase & sale agreements and tendered earnest money deposits to the builder. Shortly thereafter, construction was underway and the respective lending institutions began to release money from the buyers’ construction loans.
Problem:
Approximately halfway through the construction process, the builder verbally notified the real estate agent and contract buyers that he was experiencing financial difficulties in a separate development project due to slow sales and the inability to create cash flow.
Mistake:
Despite the contractor’s financial problems, the agent continued to market and sell the remaining lots, accepting additional earnest money and turning the funds over to the builder. The agent decided not to advise the new contract buyers of the builder’s financial problems, assuming he would be able to overcome these problems because he was a “good builder”.
Result:
The builder soon abandoned the projects that were underway and filed for bankruptcy protection. He left three contract buyers with half-completed houses and seven more with lost deposits ranging from a few thousand dollars to six figures. The buyers then sued the real estate agent alleging that he failed to disclose the builder’s true financial ability and status. The claims ultimately settled against the real estate agent, but without immediate contribution from
the builder.
Prevention:
An agent should never make assumptions about any seller’s or buyer’s financial capabilities and should certainly disclose something material in nature such as a builder’s impaired financial ability. Clearly, the agent should not have continued to accept earnest money after having learned about the builder’s financial struggles. Being a “good builder” doesn’t necessarily guarantee good business management skills. For good measure, the agent should also
confirm in writing to the existing contract buyers when a significant development such as this occurs. It should additionally be recommended to these buyers that they seek the advice of legal counsel and other qualified individuals to help them make decisions on how to proceed. Legal and financial advice should never be given by a real estate agent in any situation. Following these practices will not only result in well-informed buyers, but will help avoid
unwanted litigation.
Do you have a similar story involving disclosure to share with us? Send us your learning experience or just let us know what you think about this one! Just leave a reply below!
If you have any questions about Pearl’s Errors & Omissions Insurance for real estate professionals, give us a call at 800.447.4982—whether you’re looking for a new E&O policy or have questions about your current one. We’d love to hear from you!
Sometimes the past is one of the best learning tools around! Use the following Real-Life Errors & Omissions Claim Situation involving REALTOR® negligence to avoid a similar legal showdown happening to you in your everyday real estate career. And be sure to have a good Real Estate E&O Insurance policy in place to protect you in case you find yourself in the middle of a court battle over not disclosing property conditions.
A Real Estate agent listed a residential property on behalf of a married couple who were supposedly going to relocate to another part of the country. Approximately two months later, another couple submitted an offer through their agent that was accepted and formalized in a Purchase & Sale Agreement.
Problem:
The sellers were in the process of going through a divorce, with the wife having moved out of the property and unaware that her husband was trying to sell it.
Mistake:
The agent allowed the husband to sign the Listing Agreement and the Purchase & Sale Agreement on behalf of his wife, when both of them were the legal owners.
Result:
Following the execution of the Purchase & Sale Agreement, the husband informed his wife that he had sold the house and asked her to attend the closing to sign the necessary documents. The wife refused to do so and notified the real estate agents that the deal was not going to go forward. After the buyers were notified, they sued the sellers for specific performance under the contract. The wife seller then third-partied the listing agent into the litigation alleging that she acted negligently in accepting the forged signatures. The case was ultimately settled when the husband seller and the listing agent’s errors & omissions insurance carrier paid a monetary sum to the buyers to walk away from what was otherwise an invalid contract.
Prevention:
Many real estate errors & omissions claims can be avoided by simply exercising ordinary care to your clients. This entails knowing who your clients are and properly communicating to each one of them anything—from the comparative market values to what they should expect during the listing period and after the property goes under contract.
Obviously, getting the proper signatures or initials on all documents will help protect you and your clients, while assuring that the transaction will proceed in a straightforward and legally-binding fashion. Good communication skills and the implementation of other risk reduction methods into your daily routine will help avoid the need to pay costly attorney fees and settlements.
Do you have a similar story involving negligence to share with us? Send us your learning experience or just let us know what you think about this one! Just leave a reply below!
If you have any questions about Pearl’s Errors & Omissions Insurance for real estate professionals, give us a call at 800.447.4982—whether you’re looking for a new E&O policy or have questions about your current one. We’d love to hear from you!
Sometimes the past is one of the best learning tools around! Use the following Real-Life Errors & Omissions Claim Situation involving failure to disclose to avoid a similar legal showdown happening to you in your everyday real estate career. And be sure to have a good Real Estate E&O Insurance policy in place to protect you in case you find yourself in the middle of a court battle over not disclosing property conditions.
A real estate agent listed a residential property on behalf of sellers who completed a Seller’s Property Disclosure Statement, which revealed problems with leaky windows in the attached garage.
Problem
The property went under contract to prospective buyers, who hired a home inspector. The inspector discovered that the windows throughout the home were either defective or had been installed improperly. The findings resulted in a failed transaction, with both the sellers and the real estate agent having received a copy of the report.
Mistake
Another buyer came along and eventually purchased the property and was provided a copy of the Seller’s Property Disclosure Statement. However, the statement was not amended to reflect the results of the recent home inspection and the buyer was not provided a copy of the inspector’s report. The real estate agent claimed that she verbally advised the buyer of the content of the report.
Result
Following the close of escrow, the buyer soon discovered that most of the windows were experiencing problems. He then sued the sellers and the real estate agent alleging that by not providing the inspection report and not amending the Seller’s Property Disclosure Statement, they failed to fully disclose the defects. It was further alleged that the real estate agent recommended to the buyer that he waive the inspection contingency in the Purchase Agreement. The case ultimately settled for $12,000.
Prevention
The litigation may have been prevented if an amended Seller’s Property Disclosure Statement and the home inspection report were provided to the buyer. Although this would not necessarily guarantee that the buyer would not have brought suit under the same pretext, it would have helped the defendants position their respective cases to request that the court dismiss the litigation.
Do you have a similar story involving disclosure to share with us? Send us your learning experience or just let us know what you think about this one! Just leave a reply below!
If you have any questions about Pearl’s Errors & Omissions Insurance for real estate professionals, give us a call at 800.447.4982—whether you’re looking for a new E&O policy or have questions about your current one. We’d love to hear from you!
Sometimes the past is one of the best learning tools around! Use the following Real-Life Errors & Omissions Claim Situation involving unauthorized entry to avoid a similar legal showdown happening to you in your everyday real estate career. And be sure to have a good Real Estate E&O Insurance policy in place to protect you in case you find yourself in the middle of a court battle over repairs made before the close of escrow.
A real estate agent listed a residential property while, at the same time, working with prospective buyers who were looking for a home that could be renovated and sold later at a profit. The agent subsequently showed the property to his buyers who saw the potential in a positive resale if the floor plan could be opened up by removing portions of walls between the kitchen, dining room and living room. Eventually, the parties entered into a purchase and sale agreement.
Problem:
Due to job relocation, the seller vacated the property prior to the close of escrow and, at the request of the agent, allowed the buyers access to the property in order to take measurements for the renovation project.
Mistake:
The agent thought that it would be easier if he provided the lockbox combination to the buyers since he was confident that the buyers would meet the financial contingencies to acquire the property.
Result:
The buyers shared the agent’s confidence that the deal would go forward. They decided to get a head start on the renovation project and proceeded to remove the walls and electrical wires. Shortly thereafter, they received notification from the lending institution that their mortgage application had been denied. After applying to several other lenders with the same result, they abandoned the project and notified the agent that they were terminating the contract. The seller then sued the agent alleging that he negligently allowed the buyers unsupervised access. The seller also sued the buyers alleging unlawful entry and property damage. Four months into litigation, the parties resolved the dispute for $17,500.
Prevention:
Obviously, an agent should never provide keys or access codes to any buyer, contractor, or other unauthorized persons prior to the close of escrow. In the event a contractor must enter a property, the agent should be present only if the seller is unable to attend. In this situation, it is good practice to recommend to sellers that a relative or friend meet with the contractors in order to avoid any liability claims should something go wrong at the property. Also, a contractor will sue a real estate agent if the seller fails to pay for his services when the agent makes repair arrangements on behalf of the seller. Lastly, written authorization from the seller with “release of liability” language will go a long way in the defense of any unwarranted lawsuit.
Do you have a similar story involving unauthorized entry to a property to share with us? Send us your learning experience or just let us know what you think about this one! Just leave a reply below!
If you have any questions about Pearl’s Errors & Omissions Insurance for real estate professionals, give us a call at 800.447.4982—whether you’re looking for a new E&O policy or have questions about your current one. We’d love to hear from you!
Real Estate professionals should be extremely careful when you are showing a property, especially if you have never worked with the potential buyer before. Also be certain you are aware and use diligent safety measures when you hold an Open House. In honor of REALTOR Safety Month, please watch this video from the Washington Association of REALTORS (WAR) and the Real Estate Safety Council to learn all the tips you can for the next time you are working showing properties or for any future possible danger that may arise. We care about you!
Sometimes the past is one of the best learning tools around! Use the following Real-Life Errors & Omissions Claim Situation involving a REALTOR acting outside of her expertise to avoid a similar legal showdown happening to you in your everyday real estate career. And be sure to have a good Real Estate E&O Insurance policy in place to protect you in case you find yourself in the middle of a court battle over misrepresentation.
A residential real estate agent was approached by an industrial organization to help locate new property because it had outgrown its existing manufacturing space. The agent had handled several home sale transactions for employees of the company when they transferred in and out of town and had subsequently developed an excellent reputation with the company. The owners of the plant decided to reward the agent by engaging her services in their search.
Problem
The agent, while well-versed in residential sales, was inexperienced in commercial transactions.
Mistake
Unfamiliar with zoning issues beyond a rudimentary understanding, the agent located a piece of property that was suitable for commercial but not industrial construction—something necessary for the operation of her client’s business. Compounding the problem, the agent failed to obtain a Buyer’s Agency Agreement that contained a section requiring the client to explicitly state the type of property it was seeking. Ultimately, the commercially-zoned property was acquired after the agent represented to her client that it would be ideal for its needs.
Result
Following the close of escrow, the city denied the client’s application to construct the desired building since the intended operation did not comply with zoning regulations. A lawsuit ensued against the agent and her broker after the client’s zoning appeal failed. The lawsuit sought significant compensatory damages, including lost revenue and attorney’s fees, and asserted that the buyer relied on the expertise of the agent and broker. The buyer also alleged that they should have known that industrial zoning was required because its existing operation was zoned industrial. Faced with a likely adverse verdict at trial, the matter was resolved outside of court for a six-figure settlement.
Prevention
Mistakes often occur when a real estate professional dabbles outside his or her area of expertise. In this case, the agent should have followed pre-established office procedures and asked for assistance from her broker. The broker could also have avoided litigation if he closely supervised her throughout the transactional process. Soliciting the counsel of experts in commercial real estate could have prevented the end result.
Do you have a similar story involving complaints regarding acting within your area of expertise to share with us? Send us your learning experience or just let us know what you think about this one! Just leave a reply below!
If you have any questions about Pearl’s Errors & Omissions Insurance for real estate professionals, give us a call at 800.447.4982—whether you’re looking for a new E&O policy or have questions about your current one. We’d love to hear from you!
You can also visitwww.pearlinsurance.com/eo to find out more about our quality Errors & Omissions program, including policy features, risk management tools, and much more.
tate agent listed an owner-occupied, two-family residential property with the sellers residing on the main floor and tenants residing in a ground-floor living unit. The residence was sold rather quickly due to its appeal to investors seeking a steady flow of revenue from the long-time tenants, who expressed a desire to remain there.
